On this page
Are your price differences between segments under control?
Schedule a meetingLearn about our pricing strategy consulting servicesPrice discrimination , or price gouging, involves selling the same product at different prices depending on the customer, the quantity purchased, or the context of the purchase, in order to capture a larger share of what each customer is willing to pay. Despite its name, it is most often legal: student discounts, zone-based pricing, and volume discounts are common examples.
The Essentials in 6 Questions
The same product sold at different prices.
Pricing , marketing and sales management.
When customers have different and identifiable price sensitivities .
By customer segment , area, channel or time.
Capture more value without losing price-sensitive customers.
By quantity , version , customer group or area.
Economic theory distinguishes three forms, from the most personalized to the most collective.
| Degree | Principle | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1st degree | A price per customer, as close as possible to what they are willing to pay | Individual negotiation, personalized price |
| 2nd degree | The price varies depending on the quantity or version chosen by the customer. | Sliding scale pricing, family size, premium range |
| 3rd degree | The price varies depending on the customer's group or zone | Student discount, prices vary by store |
In retail, the most common forms are the 2nd degree, with tiered pricing and formats, and the 3rd degree, with prices by catchment area, see geopricing .
The same logic, applied to different levers.
Price segmentation is the commercial implementation of price discrimination.
Discussing price discrimination describes the economic principle; discussing price segmentation describes how to apply it: defining segments, versions, or price levels that do not cannibalize each other. For implementation, see price segmentation , and for prices that change over time, see dynamic pricing .
Porous segments, an invisible logic, or forbidden criteria.
Short answers to the most frequently asked questions about price discrimination.
Price discrimination, or price discrimination, involves selling the same product at different prices depending on the customer, the quantity purchased, or the context of the purchase, without the price difference reflecting a difference in cost. The goal is to capture a larger share of what each customer is willing to pay: to charge more to those who value the product most, while retaining price-sensitive customers. Despite its name, it is most often legal: student discounts, zone-based pricing, and volume discounts are common examples.
The three degrees of price discrimination, described by economist Arthur Pigou, range from the most personalized to the most collective. At the first degree, each customer pays a price close to what they are willing to pay, as in an individual negotiation. At the second degree, the price depends on the quantity or version the customer chooses: volume discounts, large format, premium range. At the third degree, the price depends on the customer's group or location: student discounts, different prices from one store to another.
Yes, price discrimination is legal in most of its forms: prices based on quantity, format, time of purchase, geographic area, or customer status, such as student or senior discounts. It becomes illegal when the price varies according to a discriminatory criterion as defined by the Penal Code, such as origin, sex, or religion, or when it misleads the consumer about the actual price charged. Between businesses, it falls under competition law, which notably penalizes abuses of a dominant market position.
Examples of price discrimination are numerous in everyday life. Train or plane tickets whose price varies depending on the booking date. Student discounts at cinemas or on public transport. A lower price per kilo for a large format than for a small one. Different prices from one store to another within the same chain, depending on local competition. Discounts reserved for loyalty card holders. In each case, the same product, or nearly so, is sold at different prices to customers who have different price sensitivities.
Price discrimination and price segmentation describe the same idea on two levels. Price discrimination is the economic principle: charging different prices to customers with different willingness to pay. Price segmentation is its commercial implementation: defining customer segments, versions, or price levels, and separating them sufficiently so they don't cannibalize each other. The term "segmentation" is more commonly used in business because it avoids the negative connotation of the word "discrimination." See price segmentation .
Price discrimination presents three risks. The first is the blurring of market segments: if customers willing to pay more easily access the lower price, the profit margin decreases without any increase in volume. The second is a loss of trust: price differences discovered by customers, without any understandable rationale, can be perceived as unfair and damage the price image. The third is legal: a price that varies according to a prohibited criterion exposes the company to penalties. Hence the importance of clear, explainable, and documented rules for each price difference.
Key Takeaways
Do you want to differentiate your prices without cannibalizing your offering?
Booper defines and manages consistent pricing levels by segment, area and channel.
Let's talk about your segmentation →Learn about our pricing strategy consulting servicesSegmenting an offering into several price tiers makes it possible to target different customer profiles without pitting them against each other, provided that each tier corresponds to a real difference in perceived value—not just a difference in price. If done poorly, segmentation cannibalizes the entry-level price and erodes margins rather than expanding the market.
A single national price has one advantage: simplicity. It also has a cost that is rarely quantified: according to UFC-Que Choisir, the price difference for the same basket of goods can reach €107 between two stores of the same chain, and 40% on a national scale.
A one-size-fits-all list price treats customers, channels, and brands as equivalent when they are not. According to McKinsey, up to 16.3% of the list price can be lost to unmanaged discounts. Bain & Company estimates that 415 basis points of margin can be gained through better-managed segmentation.